2
Question
In which case it has been held that under Article 141 " reliance placed on a decision without looking into factual background of case before then it is clearly impermissible."
In which case it has been held that under Article 141 " reliance placed on a decision without looking into factual background of case before then it is clearly impermissible."
Open in App
Solution
The correct option is A State of Rajasthan v. Ganeshi Lal
It was in the case of the State of Rajasthan v. Ganeshi Lal the apex court held that under Article 141 "Reliance on the decision without looking into the factual background of the case before it is clearly impermissible. A decision is a precedent on its own facts. Each case presents its own features. It is not everything said by a Judge while giving a judgment that constitutes a precedent. The only thing in a Judge's decision binding a party is the principle upon which the case is decided and for this reason, it is important to analyze a decision and isolate from it the ratio decidendi."
It was in the case of the State of Rajasthan v. Ganeshi Lal the apex court held that under Article 141 "Reliance on the decision without looking into the factual background of the case before it is clearly impermissible. A decision is a precedent on its own facts. Each case presents its own features. It is not everything said by a Judge while giving a judgment that constitutes a precedent. The only thing in a Judge's decision binding a party is the principle upon which the case is decided and for this reason, it is important to analyze a decision and isolate from it the ratio decidendi."
Suggest Corrections
0
Similar questions
View More
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
Explore more
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
