CameraIcon

SearchIcon

MyQuestionIcon

1

You visited us 1 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!

Apartheid System

Jason was a S...

Question

Jason was a South African Native who was forced to carry his identification papers at all times. One day he was trying to get home, while he was thrown into the back of a police van and taken to jail, despite presenting his papers to a white police officer. Which of the following would be the probable reason for such oppression against Jason?

A

Assimilationism

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

B

Apartheid

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

C

Anti-discrimination

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

D

Anti-segregation

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is B Apartheid
Apartheid was the system of racial discrimination followed in South Africa. The white Europeans imposed this system in South Africa. The whites had separate trains, buses, taxis, hotels, hospitals, schools, colleges, and other facilities. The entire society was segregated on the basis of their race.

Suggest Corrections

thumbs-up

2

Similar questions

Q. Jason was a South African Native who was forced to carry his identification papers at all times. One day he was trying to get home, while he was thrown into the back of a police van and taken to jail, despite presenting his papers to a white police officer. Which of the following would be the probable reason for such oppression against Jason?

Q. PRINCIPLE: No person shall be prosecuted punished for the same offence twice.
FACTUAL SITUATION: 'A', a kleptomaniac was an acquaintance of 'B' and used to visit 'B's home on weekends. One day, 'B' was unable to find his watch after a visit from 'A'. Untimatley, 'B' informed the police about the missing watch and the persons who had been to his room. The police, among others, made a search on person of 'A' and found the watch in his pocket. At his trial, the Court found him guilty of theft and sentenced him to 3 months in prison After completing his sentence, 'A' went to 'B's home to apologize for his conduct. After 'A' left, it was discovered that 'B's watch was missing, 'A' informed the police who located the watch from 'A's home. Can 'A' be prosecuted for theft?

Ayush, a resident of Bangalore, was robbed at his ancestral village while on vacation. Choose the police station he needs to report the crime at.

Q. Given below are Legal Principles followed by a Factual Situation. Apply the principles followed by a factual Situation. Apply the principle to it and select the most appropriate answer for question among the four choices given.
LEGAL PRINCIPLE: Even if the sovereign functions of the state are discharged negligently the state is not vicariously liable in tort.
FACTUAL SITUATION: A is a gold merchant in India. He was arrested by police and was detained in the police lock up after search. The gold was seized and he was later on discharged. His gold seized and he was later on discharged. His gold seized by the police was not returned. He moved against the State in tort. In the words of Supreme Court " There can be no escape from the conclusion that the police officers were negligent in dealing with the gold after its seizure". One of police officers was a Muslim. He fled with gold to Pakistan.
DECIDE.

Select the option to which the underlined part of the sentence is related.

While he was in town, Mahesh completed all his paper work and was ready for the trip within a day.

View More

Join BYJU'S Learning Program

similar_icon

Related Videos

lock

Apartheid System

CIVICS

Watch in App

explore_more_icon

Explore more

Apartheid System

Standard IX Civics

Join BYJU'S Learning Program

CrossIcon