CameraIcon

SearchIcon

MyQuestionIcon

101

You visited us 101 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!

Sub-Atomic Particles

Julius and Et...

Question

Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were tried for and found guilty of ___________.

A

Spying for Nazi Germany

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

B

Inciting opposition to World War II

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

C

Being communists

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

D

Providing information about the atomic bomb to the Soviet Union

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

E

Violating tax laws

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is D Providing information about the atomic bomb to the Soviet Union
Providing information about the atomic bomb to the Soviet Union.

Suggest Corrections

thumbs-up

0

Similar questions

Q. Which of the following come under the civil law?
A: Cases related to the violation of fundamental right
B: If found guilty, then sent to jail
C: Dispute between a tenant and a landlord
D: Petition needs to be filled
E: Case begins by lodging a First Information Report

Q. PRINCIPLE: No person shall be prosecuted punished for the same offence twice.
FACTUAL SITUATION: 'A', a kleptomaniac was an acquaintance of 'B' and used to visit 'B's home on weekends. One day, 'B' was unable to find his watch after a visit from 'A'. Untimatley, 'B' informed the police about the missing watch and the persons who had been to his room. The police, among others, made a search on person of 'A' and found the watch in his pocket. At his trial, the Court found him guilty of theft and sentenced him to 3 months in prison After completing his sentence, 'A' went to 'B's home to apologize for his conduct. After 'A' left, it was discovered that 'B's watch was missing, 'A' informed the police who located the watch from 'A's home. Can 'A' be prosecuted for theft?

Q. LEGAL PRINCIPLE: No one can be punished for the same offence twice.
FACTUAL SITUATION: Aditya is accused of harassing his colleague Nimisha. She complains to her superior and a departmental inquiry is initiated against Aditya. Aditya tries to intimidate Nimisha and continues harassing her following which she complains to the police. The departmental inquiry finds him guilty and terminates his services. Later, he is found guilty by a court and is jailed for 2 years. He claims that he has been punished twice.
DECIDE.

Q. Amrish was found guilty of damaging the data stored in a computer. The adjudicating officer fined him Rs.

1, 00, 000

and directed the amount to be paid to the aggrieved person. Advise Amrish about the course of action against this decision under the Information Technology Act, 2000.

Q. Which one of these terms collectively refers to a group of countries led by England, France, USA, and the Soviet Union during the Second World War?

View More

Join BYJU'S Learning Program

similar_icon

Related Videos

lock

Sub-Atomic Particles

CHEMISTRY

Watch in App

explore_more_icon

Explore more

Sub-Atomic Particles

Standard VII Chemistry

Join BYJU'S Learning Program

CrossIcon