wiz-icon
MyQuestionIcon
MyQuestionIcon
1
You visited us 1 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!
Question

LEGAL PRINCIPLE : The occupier of a premise owes a duty of care to all his invites and visitors.
FACTUAL SITUATION : Lalit was running a dairy from his house. People used a dart of his farm as shortcut to get to a nearby railway station. Lalit who did not approve of this, put up a notice that "Trespassers will be prosecuted". However since a number of these people were also his customers he tolerated them. one day a person who was using the short cut was attacked by a bull belonging to the farm. The injured person filed a suit against him.

A
Lalit is not liable in view of the clear notice against trespassers.
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
B
Lalit is liable for having kept a bull on his farm.
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
C
Lalit, is not liable to the people other than his customers.
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
D
Lalit is liable because in fact he allowed the people to use his premises.
Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses
Open in App
Solution

The correct option is D Lalit is liable because in fact he allowed the people to use his premises.
Lalit is liable because inspite of clear notice against the trespassers, he allowed than to use the farm's short cut.

flag
Suggest Corrections
thumbs-up
0
similar_icon
Similar questions
View More
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
similar_icon
Related Videos
thumbnail
lock
Powers of the High Court
CIVICS
Watch in App
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
CrossIcon