(1) Using mathematical induction
λ0=∝0+β0=2 → integer.
λ1=∝+β=−m =integer.
∝2−∝2+β2=(∝2+β2)−2∝β= integer since ∝+β & ∝β are integers.
Assume λnis an integer
λn+1=λn+1+βn+1=(∝n+βn)(λ+β)−λβ(λn−1+βn−1)
=−m(λn)+λn+1
& proceeding to λ2, λ, λ0 → R.H.S. is an integer.
λn+1 is an integer.
⇒ λn is an integer.
(2) λn+1.λn (∝+β)−∝βλn−1 - (1)
Now we know λ0&λ1 are co - primes.
Similarly λ1 & λ2 are also co - prime
Assume, λn & λn−1 are relatively prime.
Taking (1), if d divides λn+1 &λn, then d will divide λβ∝n−1. But ∝β=−1 ∴ d divides λn−1 But we λn & λn−1 are relatively prim. Hence d cannot divide λn−1. This is contradicting induction assumption.
∴ GCD(λn, λn+1)=1