Mind management is a way to control one’s mind. To do this, we need to be cautious about our thinking process and also need a high level of understanding and meditation as well. Understanding is wisdom – 80 percent of people are knowledgeable, while 20 per cent are wise. Knowledgeable men take sides without reason. They feel sad seeing deprived people but jealous when they see happy people. They work in the guidance of others’ inspiration, take unnecessary responsibility to keep themselves disturbed. Unless we control or manage our mind, it is difficult to achieve success and peace. Psychologists say every interest is first born in the mind as a seed. Then it continues to grow. Later it takes its real form which everybody can see. The interest that first appears in the mind remains weak for the first three minutes and it becomes strong within the next five minutes

Q. Mind management is essential …………

For a peaceful, successful, and a healthy life

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

To remain fit

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

For a wealthy life

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

To dominate others

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is A For a peaceful, successful, and a healthy life
Highlighted in the passage. “Unless we control or manage our mind, it is difficult to achieve success and peace”.

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

Do you think that a change towards a peaceful world, needs a change in the way people think? Can mind promote peace and is it enough to focus only on the human mind?

Q. Which set of keywords given below most closely captures the arguments that the passage makes?

Someone’s probably told you before that something you thought, felt or feared was ‘all in your mind’. I’m here to tell you something else: there’s no such thing as the mind and nothing is mental. I call this the ‘no mind thesis’. The no-mind thesis is entirely compatible with the idea that people are conscious, and that they think, feel, believe, desire and so on. What it’s not compatible with is the notion that being conscious, thinking, feeling, believing, desiring and so on are mental, part of the mind, or done by the mind.

The no-mind thesis doesn’t mean that people are ‘merely bodies’. Instead, it means that, when faced with a whole person, we shouldn’t think that they can be divided into a ‘mind’ and a ‘body’, or that their properties can be neatly carved up between the ‘mental’ and the ‘non-mental’. It’s notable that Homeric Greek lacks terms that can be consistently translated as ‘mind’ and ‘body’. In Homer, we find a view of people as a coherent collection of communicating parts – ‘the spirit inside my breast drives me’; ‘my legs and arms are willing’. A similar view of human beings, as a big bundle of overlapping, intelligent systems in near-constant communication, is increasingly defended in cognitive science and biology.

The terms mind and mental are used in so many ways and have such a chequered history that they carry more baggage than meaning. Ideas of the mind and the mental are simultaneously ambiguous and misleading, especially in various important areas of science and medicine.

When people talk of ‘the mind’ and ‘the mental’, the no-mind thesis doesn’t deny that they’re talking about something – on the contrary, they’re often talking about too many things at once. Sometimes, when speaking of ‘the mind’, people really mean agency; other times, cognition; still others, consciousness; some uses of ‘mental’ really mean psychiatric; others psychological; others still immaterial; and yet others, something else.

This conceptual blurriness is fatal to the usefulness of the idea of ‘the mind’. To be fair, many concepts build bridges: they exhibit a specific, generally harmless kind of ambiguity called polysemy, with slightly different meanings in different contexts. The flexibility and elasticity of polysemy binds disparate areas of research and practice together, priming people to recognise their similarities and interrelatedness.

Statement: Fashion is a form of ugliness, so is tolerable that we have alter it every six months.

Conclusions:

I. Fashion designers do not understand people`s mind very well.

II. People by and large are highly susceptible to novelty.

Q. Every individual wants peace of mind. But it is hard to find a person who can say that he has attained such a state of mental equilibrium that will allow him to live a life of tranquility. Peace of mind is a distant dream for all of us. What is the reason for this? The reason is that people hanker after ideal peace, that is, pure peace–a peace that is free from all kinds of non–peace items.But this kind of absolute peace is not in nature’s storehouse

Q. Why is peace of mind a distant dream for all of us?

Q. When people start debating on whether the effects of the Internet are good or bad, it is the content they wrestle over. What both enthusiasts and skeptics miss is the fact that as a window onto the world, and onto ourselves, the Internet shapes what we see and how we see it, and eventually, if we use it enough, changes who we are as individuals and as a society. It controls the scale and form of human association and delivers a new form of human being, whose qualities are suited to it. As Marshall McLuhan, author of ‘Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man’ wrote, the content of the medium is just the juicy bit of meat carried by the burglar to distract the watchdog of the mind.
Which of the following options best summarizes the main idea of this paragraph?

Join BYJU'S Learning Program

The correct option is A For a peaceful, successful, and a healthy lifeHighlighted in the passage. “Unless we control or manage our mind, it is difficult to achieve success and peace”.

The correct option is A For a peaceful, successful, and a healthy life
Highlighted in the passage. “Unless we control or manage our mind, it is difficult to achieve success and peace”.