Nitin, a partner of a firm dealing in computers gives an order for win worth Rs. $10, 000$ in firm's name. Discuss the liability?

The firm is liable to pay Rs.

10, 000

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

The firm can sale the wine to other

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

It does not relate to normal business of the firm. The firm will not be bound by it as act is not within implied authority of a partner

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

The firm is liable to pay Rs.

10, 000

and if firm fails to pay then only Nitin will be liable to pay the amount

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is C It does not relate to normal business of the firm. The firm will not be bound by it as act is not within implied authority of a partner
Implied Authority is the authority that is not conferred by the mutual agreement between the partners and which is not bind on other partners.
This authority is acted on the ordinary course of business and the firm is bound by such authority when the act is done in a normal way of carrying on the firm's business.
These authority is also known as ostensible authority or apparent authority. Since the act is not related to the ordinary business of the firm. The firm is not liable to pay the amount.

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

Q. If a firm produces goods with Rs. 10,000 and the cost of raw materials is Rs. 10,000 and the firm will pay tax on Rs. 4000. It is paying tax according to:

Q. Neha, a partner, owns a building in which the firm carries its business. The firm pays her

R s . 10, 000

as rent of the building. To which account rent will be debited?

Ram borrowed Rs. 10,000 from a firm. However, he fails to pay back and defaults. The firm should ensure that this loss is recorded in the books.

Which concept is illustrated in this example?

Q. Pass Journal entries for the following:
(a) Realisation expenses amounted to Rs. 10,000 were paid on the behalf of Alok, a partner, with whom it was agreed at Rs. 7,500.
(b) Realisation expenses amounted to Rs. 5,000 It was agreed that the firm will pay Rs. 2,000 and balance by Ravinder, a Partner.
(c) Dissolution expenses amounted to Rs. 10,000 were paid by Amit, a partner, on behalf of the firm.

Q. Rohit is not a partner in a particular firm. But, he represents himself or knowingly permits himself to be represented as a partner of that particular firm to Sanjay, who on the faith of such a representation gives credit to the firm. Is Rohit liable as a partner in the firm?

Join BYJU'S Learning Program

Nitin, a partner of a firm dealing in computers gives an order for win worth Rs. 10,000 in firm's name. Discuss the liability?

Nitin, a partner of a firm dealing in computers gives an order for win worth Rs. $10, 000$ in firm's name. Discuss the liability?