Nonprofit organizations depend on two resources to fulfill their missions. One, of course, is money.The other resource - just as vital but perhaps even more scarce - is leadership. Indeed, qualified leadership candidates may be even rarer than six-figure donors.
As one highly respected executive director recently observed, "If I have the choice between spending time with a $100,000 donor or a potential candidate for a senior role, hands down it's the candidate.”
The passage is talking about getting new leadership candidates whereas option (a) is talking about retaining the old ones. Option (a) is hence ruled out. Option (b) is not doing anything to take the issue presented in the paragraph further. Option (d) is irrelevant here. Option (e) talks about donations, whereas we need an answer that talks about the problem of hiring people for leadership roles. Only option (c) is relevant to the question asked. It explains through an example that leadership is more difficult to obtain than donors.