People arguing for a position have been known to cast the opposite in an unnecessarily feeble light (…….). People who indulge in this fallacy may be fearful or ignorant of a strong counter argument. Detecting this fallacy often depends on having already heard a better refutation, or having information on which one to construct.

Casting the opposite as weaker than it really is, is a very effective strategy.

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

This portrayal of a refutation as weaker than it really is, is a sure way of proving your point.

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Casting the opposite as weaker than it really is, is not a very effective strategy.

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

This portrayal of refutation as weaker than it really is, is unwarranted.

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is C Casting the opposite as weaker than it really is, is not a very effective strategy.
Casting the opposite as weaker than it really is, is not a very effective strategy.

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

__provides information and support to people who have, or may be at risk for genetic disorder.

Q. Membership in the Bangalore Club is easily obtained by those who have previously had strong social connections with existing club members before college. However, one must have attended high school with one or more of the members in order to forge such strong social connections. People who lack these social connections because they have not attended high school with one or more current club members will therefore find it difficult to join the club. This argument displays flawed reasoning because it neglects to consider the possibility that

Q. In certain circumstances, a person who has been entrusted with anothers property, may have to incur unauthorized expenses to protect or preserve it. This is known as _____.

Q. 18. In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between “strong” arguments and “weak” arguments “Strong” arguments must be both important and directly related to the question. “Weak” arguments may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspects of the questions.
Even if the explicit intent of a film is to make fun of people who stammer, so what? Such a mockery always reflects badly on those doing the mocking, not on those being mocked. Why be so sensitive to criticism and mockery (or even abuse)?
Which of the following statement reflects the strong argument for the above premises?

Everyone has the right to live. Yet, is everybody getting enough water to live or even water to drink? Why is it that some people have to buy drinking water? Should it be like this? Water on this earth is for one and all. Some people draw out water from the ground by deep bore wells. How far is it correct? Have you ever seen this? Why do some people put a pump directly in the Jal Board pipe line? What problems would other people face due to this? Do you have any such experience?

Join BYJU'S Learning Program

The correct option is C Casting the opposite as weaker than it really is, is not a very effective strategy.Casting the opposite as weaker than it really is, is not a very effective strategy.

The correct option is C Casting the opposite as weaker than it really is, is not a very effective strategy.
Casting the opposite as weaker than it really is, is not a very effective strategy.