The correct option is C Bond length in N+2 is less than N2
(a) The electronic configuration of
N2=(σ1s)2(σ∗1s)2(σ2s)2(σ∗2s)2(π2px)2(π2py)2(σ2pz)2
Thus, electronic configuration of
N+2=(σ1s)2(σ∗1s)2(σ2s)2(σ∗2s)2(π2px)2(π2py)2(σ2pz)2
So bond order of N2=10−42=3
Bond order of N+2=9−52=2.5
Since bond order of N2 is more compared to N+2, thus, thus N2 has greater dissociation energy than N+2
(b) The electronic configuration of
O2=(σ1s)2(σ∗1s)2(σ2s)2(σ∗2s)2(σ2pz)2(π2px)2(π2py)2(π∗2px)1(π∗2py)1
The electronic configuration of
O+2=(σ1s)2(σ∗1s)2(σ2s)2(σ∗2s)2(σ2pz)2(π2px)2(π2py)2(π∗2px)1
So the bond order of O2=10−62=2
Bond order of O+2=10−52=2.5
Since bond order of O2 is less than that of O+2, thus O2 has lower dissociation energy than O+2.
(c) Bond order of N2 is more compared to N+2 and again we know, bond length ∝1 bond order .
SO bond length of N+2 is more than that of N2.
(d) The electronic confiuration of
NO=(σ1s)2(σ∗1s)2(σ2s)2(σ∗2s)2(π2px)2(π2py)2(σ2pz)2(π∗2px)1
The electronic confiuration of
NO+=(σ1s)2(σ∗1s)2(σ2s)2(σ∗2s)2(π2px)2(π2py)2(σ2pz)2
The bond order of NO=10−52=2.5
The bond order of NO+=10−42=3
Since bond order of NO+ is more, thus bond length in NO+ is less than in NO