wiz-icon
MyQuestionIcon
MyQuestionIcon
1
You visited us 1 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!
Question

Principle : A citizen is expected to take reasonable duty of care while driving on the road and not to cause injuries to any person.
Facts : X, the owner of a car, asked his friend Y to drive the car to his office. As the car was near his (X's) office, it hit a pedestrian P on account 'Y's negligent driving and injured him seriously. P sued X for damages. Which one of the following is correct?

A
X is not liable as it was the negligence of Y
Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses
B
The liability was solely of Y as X was not accompanying him
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
C
As Y was driving under X's care and authority, X is liable
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
D
X is not liable under the principle of inevitable accident
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
Open in App
Solution

The correct option is A X is not liable as it was the negligence of Y
According to the principle citizens is expected to take reasonable duty of care, the fact that Y injured P proves that Y did not observe reasonable care on his behalf. X cannot be made liable for the same.

flag
Suggest Corrections
thumbs-up
0
similar_icon
Similar questions
View More
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
similar_icon
Related Videos
thumbnail
lock
Insurance - Functions, Principles, Elements part 1
BUSINESS STUDIES
Watch in App
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
CrossIcon