wiz-icon
MyQuestionIcon
MyQuestionIcon
13
You visited us 13 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!
Question

PRINCIPLE: An agreement is void to the extent that it restricts absolutely, a party from enforcing his contractual rights by usual proceedings in any ordinary event.
FACTS: A and B entered into a transaction in Delhi for sale of goods based in Delhi. The contract stated that in case of a dispute, only civil courts in Chennai would have jurisdiction. Neither A nor B reside or carried on business in Chennai.

A
The contract is valid since it is still on Indian court that has jurisdication
Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses
B
The contract is void since it ousts the jurisdiction of the competent court
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
C
The contract is void since the consent of the court is required before entering into such a contract
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
D
The contract is valid since Chennai courts have expertise with respect to contractual matters
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
Open in App
Solution

The correct option is A The contract is valid since it is still on Indian court that has jurisdication
The contract is valid since both the parties can enforce their contractual rights by usual proceedings. This is because even though the jurisdiction is under Chennai court it is still under Indian courts.

flag
Suggest Corrections
thumbs-up
0
similar_icon
Similar questions
View More
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
similar_icon
Related Videos
thumbnail
lock
Legal Protection of Consumers
BUSINESS STUDIES
Watch in App
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
CrossIcon