CameraIcon

SearchIcon

MyQuestionIcon

2

You visited us 2 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!

Business Studies

Important Laws

PRINCIPLE: An...

Question

PRINCIPLE: An agreement is void to the extent that it restricts absolutely, a party from enforcing his contractual rights by usual proceedings in any ordinary event.
FACTS: A and B entered into a transaction in Delhi for sale of goods based in Delhi. The contract stated that in case of a dispute, only civil courts in Chennai would have jurisdiction. Neither A nor B reside or carried on business in Chennai.

A

The contract is valid since it is still on Indian court that has jurisdication

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

B

The contract is void since it ousts the jurisdiction of the competent court

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

C

The contract is void since the consent of the court is required before entering into such a contract

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

D

The contract is valid since Chennai courts have expertise with respect to contractual matters

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is A The contract is valid since it is still on Indian court that has jurisdication
The contract is valid since both the parties can enforce their contractual rights by usual proceedings. This is because even though the jurisdiction is under Chennai court it is still under Indian courts.

Suggest Corrections

thumbs-up

0

Similar questions

Q. Given below is a statement of legal principle followed by factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts and select the most appropriate answer.

PRINCIPLE: An agreement is void to the extent that it restricts absolutely, a party from enforcing his contractual rights by usual proceedings in any ordinary court.

FACTS: A and B entered into a transaction in Delhi for sale of goods based in Delhi. The contract stated that in case of a dispute, only civil courts in Chennai would have jurisdiction. Neither A, nor B resided or carried on business in Chennai.

Q. Consists of legal proposition(s) principle(s) (herein after referred to as 'principle') and facts. Such principle may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this Section. In other words, in answering these questions, you must not rely on any principle except the principles that are given herein below for every question.
Further, you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem-solving ability, even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of the law.
Therefore, to answer a question, the principle is to be applied to the given facts and to choose the most appropriate option.
Principle: Every agreement, by which any party is restricted absolutely from enforcing his right in respect of any contract, by the usual legal proceedings in the ordinary Tribunals, is void to that extent. The law also provides that nobody can confer jurisdiction to a civil court by an agreement between parties.
Facts: A and B entered into a valid contract for rendering certain services. A clause in the contract was that in case of any dispute arose out of the contract; it shall be referred to for Arbitration only. Is the contract valid?

Q. Legal Principle: An agreement made with the intention of entering into legal relationship gives rise to a contract.
Factual Situation: Two firms entered into a written contract for the sale and purchase of tissue paper. The agreement contained a clause to the effect that 'this agreement is not entered into, nor is this memorandum written, as a formal or a legal document, and shall not be subject to legal jurisdiction in the law courts'. Since the goods were not delivered, the buyers brought an action for non-delivery.
Issue: Are the sellers liable?

Q. Solve.
X Ltd. was appointed as an agent by Y Ltd. by an agreement. One of the causes of the agreement provided, This agreement is not entered into as a formal or legal agreement and shah not be subject to legal jurisdiction in the law courts Is this agreement a valid contract?

Q. Solve:
State whether the following contracts of sale amount to sale or an agreement to sell.
Case (a): X entered into a contract for sale of the entire crop of rice that would yield on his farm.
Case (b): A railway administration entered into a contract for sale of coal-ash that might. accumulate during the period of contract.
Case (c): X entered into a contract for sale of some goods in a particular ship to be delivered on the arrival of the ship.
Case (d): X entered into a contract for sale of a painting only if Z, its present owner, sells it to him.

View More

Join BYJU'S Learning Program

similar_icon

Related Videos

lock

Legal Protection of Consumers

BUSINESS STUDIES

Watch in App

explore_more_icon

Explore more

Standard XII Business Studies

Join BYJU'S Learning Program

CrossIcon