CameraIcon
CameraIcon
SearchIcon
MyQuestionIcon
MyQuestionIcon
1
You visited us 1 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!
Question

Principle : Intentional application of force to another person is actionable in law.
Facts : 'P' and 'D' are unknown to each other. When 'P' is about to sit on a chair, 'D' intentionally pulls it away as a result of which 'P' falls on to the floor and is injured.

A
'D' is not liable as such jokes are common in the society.
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
B
'D' is not liable as 'P' is not seriously injured.
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
C
'D' is liable as he intentionally caused injury to 'P'.
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
D
'D' is not liable as the injury is not directly caused.
Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses
Open in App
Solution

The correct option is D 'D' is not liable as the injury is not directly caused.
Criminal and Civil Law, 'battery' is He intentional touching of, or application of force to, the body of another person in a harmful or offensive manner (without consent). Three main elements are:
(1) intent (2) contact (3) Harm. In the given case "contact" is missing. The reasonable conclusion is drawn that D is not liable as the injury is not directly caused. Hence option (d) is correct.

flag
Suggest Corrections
thumbs-up
0
similar_icon
Similar questions
View More
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
similar_icon
Related Videos
thumbnail
lock
Third Law of Motion
PHYSICS
Watch in App
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
CrossIcon