Principle Interference with another's goods in such a way as to deny the latter's title to the goods amounts to conversion, and this it is a civil wrong. It is an act intentionally done inconsistent with the owner's right, though the doer may not know of, or intend to challenge, the property or possession of the true owner.
Facts 'R' went to a cycle-stand to park his bicycle. Seeing the stand fully occupied, he removed a few bicycles in order to rearrange a portion of the stand and male some space for his bicycle. He parked his bicycle properly, and put back all the bicycles except the one belonging to 'S', In fact 'R' was in a hurry, and therefore, he could not put back S's bicycle.
Somebody came on the way and took away S's bicycle. The watchman of the stand did not take care of it assuming that the bicycle was not parked inside the stand. 'S' filed a suit against 'R' for conversion.
Which of the following derivations is correct?