wiz-icon
MyQuestionIcon
MyQuestionIcon
1
You visited us 1 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!
Question

Principle: Qui facit per alium facit per se, i.e., he who does things through others does it himself.


Facts: Nisha, the owner of a car, asked her friend Saurabh to take her car and drive the same to her office. As the car was near her office, it hit a pedestrian Srikant on account of Saurabh's negligent driving and injured him seriously. Now, Srikant files a suit for damages against Nisha.

A
Nisha is not liable as it was the negligence of Saurabh.
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
B
Saurabh is solely liable as Nisha was not driving the car.
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
C
Nisha is liable as Saurabh was driving under her authority and for her purpose.
Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses
D
Saurabh will be exempted from liability under the principle of inevitable accident.
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
Open in App
Solution

The correct option is C Nisha is liable as Saurabh was driving under her authority and for her purpose.
Option 'c' apparently seems correct as the guiding principle says that he who does things through others, does it himself. Thus in given case Alisha authorised Saurabh to driver her car and for her purpose she is responsible for the accident.However this case is playable in the court of law as Nisha had not asked Saurabh to hit anyone further she did not authorise Saurabh to drive in a way to hit someone as the work was not time bound further Saurabh could have driven carefully so he should also be personally held liable.

flag
Suggest Corrections
thumbs-up
0
similar_icon
Similar questions
View More
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
similar_icon
Related Videos
thumbnail
lock
Insurance - Functions, Principles, Elements part 1
BUSINESS STUDIES
Watch in App
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
CrossIcon