wiz-icon
MyQuestionIcon
MyQuestionIcon
1
You visited us 1 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!
Question

Q. As a senior officer in the finance ministry, you have access to some confidential and crucial information about the policy decisions that the government is about to announce. These decisions are likely to have a far-reaching impact on the housing and construction industry. If the builders have access to this information beforehand, they can make huge profits. One of the builders has done a lot of quality work for the government and is known to be close to your immediate superior, who asks you to disclose this information to the said builder.

What are the options available to you?

Evaluate each of these options and choose the option which you would adopt, giving reasons

Open in App
Solution

One option could be to pass on the information to the builder. It can be argued that the builder did quality work for the government and deserves to be awarded. Another plausible argument is that officers are obliged under service discipline to obey the orders of the superior officers. Both arguments are fallacious.

If a builder is to be awarded for quality or timely work, it could be only in accordance with a contract. It may provide for some performance incentives. If he meets the requirements, he can be given those incentives. If he meets the requirements, he can be given those incentives. Other than this, no benefits are admissible.

While officers have to obey orders of superiors, they cannot obey illegal orders. Duty of the

Obedience applies only to lawful orders. The immediate superior’s order is illegal. Some government policies are commercially sensitive. No one should divulge them prematurely to interested parties. They are made public to all at the same through authorized official releases.

Another very risky option is to tip off the builder through a reliable third party. The premature leak of a sensitive policy, if discovered, will lead to police investigations and the officer can go to jail for divulging official secrets. As this an open and shut case, no option other than politely refusing to follow the illegal orders is available. One may try to resort to tricks or evasive conduct such as conveying wrong information or informing the builder only after the policy become public. There is no point in trying these ruses. It is better to refuse upfront to divulge the matter.


flag
Suggest Corrections
thumbs-up
5
similar_icon
Similar questions
Q.

Q. You are a sixth-year graduate student at a large university in the final months of your dissertation research on novel photonic materials. You are worried about your next appointment and have applied for several postdoctoral positions in this field plus a few tenure-track assistant professorships at universities where you would like to work. To your surprise and pleasure, you are invited for an interview for a tenure-track appointment at your undergraduate alma mater, a prestigious research institution in a city where you already have connections and would love to live.

In the question-and-answer period following your seminar on your research, the department chair asks for detailed information about the novel material- preparation technique developed in your graduate research and used extensively in your experiments. Your group is working on a patent application and its members have agreed not to provide details until a paper currently being prepared is submitted for publication. Your thesis advisor will be giving the first major presentation on the technique at a major international conference in a couple of months.

You answer that you and your colleagues are in the process of writing it up for publication and a patent application, and you would be glad to send them an early preprint when it is available. The question and answer period continues and concludes uneventfully and pleasantly. After the seminar, in your private interview with the Chair, he pushes harder for this information, remarking that the Department seeks team players, willing to share information with department colleagues, and referring to your undergraduate roots and the need to prove you are one of them to be a viable candidate for the position.

Questions:

View More
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
similar_icon
Related Videos
thumbnail
lock
VS4
CIVICS
Watch in App
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
CrossIcon