wiz-icon
MyQuestionIcon
MyQuestionIcon
5
You visited us 5 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!
Question

Q. In which of the following cases was Right to Livelihood made an inherent part of Right to Life by the Supreme Court ?

A

Minerva Mills case
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
B

Olga Tellis Case
Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses
C

Kesavananda Bharati case
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
D

Golaknath case
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
Open in App
Solution

The correct option is B
Olga Tellis Case
Explanation:

The Supreme Court gave an important decision regarding the rights of slum-dwellers in Bombay in response to a Public Interest Litigation filed by a social activist, Olga Tellis against Bombay Municipal Corporation in 1985. The petition claimed the right to live on pavements or in slums because there was no alternative accommodation available close to their place of work. If they were forced to move they would lose their livelihood as well.The Supreme Court said, “Article 21 of the Constitution which guaranteed the right to life included the right to livelihood. Therefore If pavement dwellers were to be evicted they should first be provided alternative accommodation under the right to shelter.”

flag
Suggest Corrections
thumbs-up
2
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
similar_icon
Related Videos
thumbnail
lock
Role of the Judiciary
CIVICS
Watch in App
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
CrossIcon