Q. With reference to Article 20 of the Indian Constitution, which of the following statements is/are correct?
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
A
All of the above
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
B
2 and 3 only
Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses
C
1 and 3 only
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
D
1 and 2 only
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
Open in App
Solution
The correct option is B 2 and 3 only
Explanation:
Statement 1 is incorrect: The provision of double jeopardy is limited only to judicial proceedings in front of the magistrate and does not cover inter-departmental proceedings related to the offence.
Statement 2 is correct: The Indian Constitution provides immunity to an accused against self-incrimination under Article 20(3). It is based on the legal maxim “Nemo tenetur prodere accussare seipsum'' which means “no man is obliged to be a witness against himself.” However, the same is limited to criminal cases.
Statement 3 is correct: An ex-post-facto law is one that imposes penalties retrospectively, that is, upon acts already done or which increases the penalties for such acts. The enactment of such a law is prohibited by the first provision of Article 20.