Read
this dialogue. Which argument do you agree with? Why?
Amit:
Looking at the constitutional provisions, it seems that the President
is only a rubber stamp.
Shama:
The President appoints the Prime Minister. So, he must have the
powers to remove the Prime Minister as well.
Rajesh:
We don’t need a President. After the election, the Parliament
can meet and elect a leader to be the Prime Minister.
Read this dialogue. Which argument do you agree with? Why?
Amit: Looking at the constitutional provisions, it seems that the President is only a rubber stamp.
Shama: The President appoints the Prime Minister. So, he must have the powers to remove the Prime Minister as well.
Rajesh: We don’t need a President. After the election, the Parliament can meet and elect a leader to be the Prime Minister.
Any
answer supported with argument or explanation would solve the
purpose. It is strongly recommended that you prepare the
solution on your own. However, one sample solution has been
provided for your reference:
The
argument raised by Amit is correct.Looking at the
constitutional provisions, it appears that the President is only a
rubber stamp. This is because despite having certain discretionary
powers, the President is bound to act according to the advice given
by the council of ministers. Even the veto power of the President is
limited. For instance, the President has to give assent to the bill
which has been rejected by him earlier if it is passed by the
parliament again.
Any answer supported with argument or explanation would solve the purpose. It is strongly recommended that you prepare the solution on your own. However, one sample solution has been provided for your reference:
The argument raised by Amit is correct.Looking at the constitutional provisions, it appears that the President is only a rubber stamp. This is because despite having certain discretionary powers, the President is bound to act according to the advice given by the council of ministers. Even the veto power of the President is limited. For instance, the President has to give assent to the bill which has been rejected by him earlier if it is passed by the parliament again.
