Hi,
we found some strange behavior when operating with floats and round().
The following simplified statement reproduces the problem.
select 6.56  round(convert(float, 6.56), 2)
from sysusers where name = 'public';
===========
8.88178419
In "real world", the floats are not literals, but float fields in tables.
I could figure, that 6.56  6.56 will result in something like 0.00001,
but 8.88178419 is beyond my imagination.
The same statement without round results in 0.
Has anyone any clue on this?
Regards,
Peter 5 12340
Somehow you're truncating the result, and losing the E16 (which means
*10^16). Where are you retrieving your results? I doubt query analyzer
would do this..
select 6.56  round(convert(float, 6.56), 2)

8.8817841970012523E16
BTW, you can add E or E0 to the end instead of convert(float, constant)
select 6.56  round(6.56e, 2)

8.8817841970012523E16
6.56 is a decimal constant, and 6.56e is a float. Rounding apparently rounds
up, even when the result is further from the exact number.
select 6.56e union all
select round(6.56e,2)

6.5599999999999996
6.5600000000000005
If your client app can't deal with floats properly, perhaps you could pass
back a varchar:
select cast(cast(6.56e as decimal(9,2)) as varchar(10))

6.56
Actually, the cast as decimal shouldn't be necessary; casting as varchar
automatically rounds:
select cast(6.56e as varchar(10))

6.56
Actually, it rounds a lot more than I would have thought
select cast(6.560001e as varchar(54))

6.56
If I want to see more digits, it seems I have to cast as decimal...
select cast(cast(6.56000001e as decimal(9,8)) as varchar(10))

6.56000001
But be careful:
select cast(cast(6.56000001e as decimal(9,8)) as varchar(9))
Server: Msg 8115, Level 16, State 5, Line 1
Arithmetic overflow error converting numeric to data type varchar.
Return no more than 16 digits (15 decimals) for a number 0..10 and it should
be rounded properly.
select cast(cast(6.56e as decimal(18,17)) as varchar(19))

6.55999999999999960
select cast(cast(6.56e as decimal(18,15)) as varchar(19))

6.560000000000000

Incidentally, I wonder why QA sees the need to return a 53character result
for a float. It should never need to be over 18 decimals + 1 for the decimal
point + 5 for the exponent = 24.
Hmm, BOL says this about float data type:
The MicrosoftŽ SQL ServerT float[(n)] data type conforms to the SQL92
standard for all values of n from 1 to 53. The synonym for double precision
is float(53).
So it's treating the precision (53) as the the width... weird.

"Peter Scheurer" <sc******@gmx.com> wrote in message
news:2b**************************@posting.google.c om...
Hi,
we found some strange behavior when operating with floats and round().
The following simplified statement reproduces the problem.
select 6.56  round(convert(float, 6.56), 2)
from sysusers where name = 'public';
===========
8.88178419
In "real world", the floats are not literals, but float fields in tables.
I could figure, that 6.56  6.56 will result in something like 0.00001,
but 8.88178419 is beyond my imagination.
The same statement without round results in 0.
Has anyone any clue on this?
Regards,
Peter
"Peter Scheurer" <sc******@gmx.com> wrote in message
news:2b**************************@posting.google.c om... Hi,
we found some strange behavior when operating with floats and round(). The following simplified statement reproduces the problem.
select 6.56  round(convert(float, 6.56), 2) from sysusers where name = 'public'; =========== 8.88178419
In "real world", the floats are not literals, but float fields in tables. I could figure, that 6.56  6.56 will result in something like 0.00001, but 8.88178419 is beyond my imagination. The same statement without round results in 0.
Has anyone any clue on this? Regards, Peter
The result of the query above is this (on my system):
8.8817841970012523E16
Note the E16 at the end  that's the number before the E multiplied by 10
to the power of minus 16, which is a very small number indeed. Since float
calculations are not precise, a very small difference is not unusual.
Compare the result of this query:
select cast(1.01 as float)cast(1.0 as float)
1.0000000000000009E2
This is roughly 1E2, ie. 0.01.
Simon
I'd like to add that decimal calculations aren't precise either, if you are
calculating with numbers that can't be represented 100% accurately in a
decimal form, eg 1.0/3.0 or 1.0/7.0. Binary calculations are precise on
numbers that are representable accurately in binary in the number of bits
provided in the mantissa of the FLOAT (53 bits) or REAL (24 bits), eg. any
number which can be represented as SUM(POWER(2,x)) where x is a range of
integers such that MAX(x)MIN(x) <= 52, for FLOAT. Decimals are often not
accurately represented in binary (FLOAT/REAL), because 1/5 is not accurately
representable in binary. The Decimal datatypes change the exponent to a
power of 10, and make the mantissa an integer of 4, 8, 12 or 16 bytes, so
that all decimal numbers of up to 38 digits can be accurately represented.
SELECT 1.2./3.1./3.

.000001
(wow, only 6 decimals by default for a decimal?)
SELECT 1  2/3e0  1/3e0

5.5511151231257827E17
SELECT 1.0/7.0*7.0

.9999990
SELECT 1.0/7.0*7.0
declare @decimals int
declare @sql varchar(80)
set @decimals=0
while @decimals<37
begin
set @sql='print cast(1.'+replicate('0',@decimals)+' as varbinary)'
exec(@sql)
set @decimals = @decimals + 1
end
Some output:
0x0100000101000000  1. is represented as 1 * 10^(11)
0x020100010A000000  1.0 is 10 (0x0A) * 10^(21)
0x0302000164000000  1.00 is 100 (0x64) * 10^(31)... etc
....
0x0B0A000100E40B5402000000
....
0x15140001000010632D5EC76B05000000
....
0x1E1D0001000000A0CA17726DAE0F1E4301000000
....
0x2524000100000000109F4BB31507C97BCE97C000
"Simon Hayes" <sq*@hayes.ch> wrote in message
news:40********@news.bluewin.ch...
[...] Since float
calculations are not precise, a very small difference is not unusual.
Compare the result of this query:
select cast(1.01 as float)cast(1.0 as float)
1.0000000000000009E2
This is roughly 1E2, ie. 0.01.
Simon
Thank you Simon and Aaron,
you were both right:
I tried the statement with query analyzer and I got the correct and
complete result.
It is sqltalk  a tool from Centura Developer, that does the wrong job
when converting floats for viewing in the result window.
Thank you for helping me.
Peter The result of the query above is this (on my system):
8.8817841970012523E16
Note the E16 at the end  that's the number before the E multiplied by 10 to the power of minus 16, which is a very small number indeed. Since float calculations are not precise, a very small difference is not unusual. Compare the result of this query:
select cast(1.01 as float)cast(1.0 as float)
1.0000000000000009E2
This is roughly 1E2, ie. 0.01.
Simon
Thank you Simon and Aaron,
you were both right:
I tried the statement with query analyzer and I got the correct and
complete result.
It is sqltalk  a tool from Centura Developer, that does the wrong job
when converting floats for viewing in the result window.
Thank you for helping me.
Peter The result of the query above is this (on my system):
8.8817841970012523E16
Note the E16 at the end  that's the number before the E multiplied by 10 to the power of minus 16, which is a very small number indeed. Since float calculations are not precise, a very small difference is not unusual. Compare the result of this query:
select cast(1.01 as float)cast(1.0 as float)
1.0000000000000009E2
This is roughly 1E2, ie. 0.01.
Simon This discussion thread is closed Replies have been disabled for this discussion. Similar topics
2 posts
views
Thread by j vickroy 
last post: by

9 posts
views
Thread by Vineet Jain 
last post: by

9 posts
views
Thread by Marc Schellens 
last post: by

5 posts
views
Thread by Pat 
last post: by

9 posts
views
Thread by Domel 
last post: by

6 posts
views
Thread by Dave win 
last post: by

3 posts
views
Thread by Terje Barman 
last post: by

19 posts
views
Thread by morc 
last post: by

116 posts
views
Thread by Dilip 
last post: by
          