Solve.
P left, his carriage on D's premises and D's landlord seized the, carriage for non-payment of the rent P paid the rent to obtain the release of his carriage. Could P recover the amount from D?

Open in App

Solution

Solution: Section to which the given problem relates: Section 69
Decision and Reason: P could recover the amount from D because he made the payment which D was bound by law to pay
Leading case: Exall v. Patridge.

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

Q. Amounts paid for wages, salary, carriage of goods, repairs, rent and interest, etc., are items of ___________.

Which of the following account(s) will be affected, while rectifying the error of carriage charges, paid for a new plant purchased mistakenly debited to carriage account?

Q. Ascertain Gross Profit from the following:

	₹		₹
Opening Stock	2,00,000	Carriage on Sales	30,000
Closing Stock	1,80,000	Office Rent	58,000
Purchases	8,50,000	Sales	14,07,000
Carriage on Purchases	23,000

Q. A cylinder rests in a supporting carriage as shown. The side AB of carriage makes an angle

30^{0}

with the horizontal and side BC is vertical. The carriage lies on a fixed horizontal surface and is being pulled towards left with an horizontal acceleration 'a'.
The magnitude of normal reactions exerted by sides AB and BC of carriage on the cylinder be

N_{A B} a n d N_{B C}

respectively. Neglect friction everywhere. Then as the magnitude of acceleration 'a ' of the carriage is increased, pick up the correct statement(s).

Q. Select the most appropriate alternative from the alternatives given below and rewrite the statement.

A payment of Rs. 100 to Kokate Carriage Co. for bringing a machine to the business place should be debited to ______.
a) Machine A/c
b) Cash A/c
c) Kokate carnage Co. A/c
d) Carriage A/c

Join BYJU'S Learning Program

Solve.P left, his carriage on D's premises and D's landlord seized the, carriage for non-payment of the rent P paid the rent to obtain the release of his carriage. Could P recover the amount from D?

Solution: Section to which the given problem relates: Section 69Decision and Reason: P could recover the amount from D because he made the payment which D was bound by law to payLeading case: Exall v. Patridge.

Solve.
P left, his carriage on D's premises and D's landlord seized the, carriage for non-payment of the rent P paid the rent to obtain the release of his carriage. Could P recover the amount from D?

Solution: Section to which the given problem relates: Section 69
Decision and Reason: P could recover the amount from D because he made the payment which D was bound by law to pay
Leading case: Exall v. Patridge.