The correct option is D Both statements are false
The only thing that remains constant throughout a conductor surface is potential. Let’s see what this means for charge density.
We know that potential of a uniformly charged sphere of radius r1 having charge Q1 is V1=Q14πε0r1
The same for another sphere of smaller radius r2 and charge Q2 is V2=Q24πε0r2
If these two spheres are connected either by a wire (or are part of the same solid conductor),
Then, we can equate the potentials to get,
Q14πε0r1=Q24πε0r2
Q1×r14πε0r1×r1=Q2×r24πε0r2×r2
Since charge by surface area gives charge density σ,
σ1r1=σ2r2
σ1σ2=r2r1
The higher the radius of curvature of a surface, the lower the charge density. Thus the sharper parts of a conductor will have higher charge density. And the broader parts will have less charge density. This is what leads to Corona discharge.
Statement 1 is obviously false.
With regard to statement 2, all that can be said is that, just because like charges repel, doesn’t mean they arrange to give uniform charge density. They will arrange till they are in equilibrium and that gives varying densities on irregularly shaped conductors