wiz-icon
MyQuestionIcon
MyQuestionIcon
1
You visited us 1 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!
Question

Statement: Rutherford’s atomic model was a great improvement over the previous models, but later discarded

Reason: Rutherford’s atomic model failed to explain the stability of electrons in a circular path.

Which of the following holds true?

A

Both Statement and Reason are true and Reason is the correct explanation for Statement.
Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses
B

Both Statement and Reason are true but Reason is not the correct explanation for Statement.
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
C

Only Reason is true but the Statement is false.
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
D
Only Statement is true but the Reason is false.
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
Open in App
Solution

The correct option is A
Both Statement and Reason are true and Reason is the correct explanation for Statement.

The alpha particle scattering experiment on gold foil proved that the positive charge of the atom is concentrated in a tiny volume at the centre of the atom. This disproved Thomson’s model.
Rutherford also proposed that electrons revolve around the nucleus as the planets revolve around the Sun.
However, when a charged particle revolves around another charged body, it continuously emits energy. Thus, the electron should lose energy and eventually collapse into the nucleus. But, this is not the case. Rather, an atom is quite stable. Hence, Rutherford’s atomic model failed to explain the stability of electrons in a circular path and was discarded.

flag
Suggest Corrections
thumbs-up
0
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
similar_icon
Related Videos
thumbnail
lock
Rutherford Model
CHEMISTRY
Watch in App
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
CrossIcon