CameraIcon

SearchIcon

MyQuestionIcon

1

You visited us 1 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!

Arguments Against Democracy

Statement : S...

Question

Statement : Should persons convicted of criminal offences in the past be allowed to contest elections in India ?
Arguments :
I. No. Such persons cannot serve the cause of the people and country.
II. Yes. It is democracy - let people decide whom to vote.

A

Only argument I is strong

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

B

Only argument II is strong

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

C

Either I or II is strong

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

D

Neither I nor II is strong

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

E

Both I and II are strong

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is C Only argument I is strong
Should persons convicted of criminal offences in the past be allowed to contest elections in India ?
Person who have done criminal offence are not trustworthy to represent people because there are chances they can be harmful for common people once they came to power even in case of democratic country.
Thus argument I is true.
Hence, Option A is correct.

Suggest Corrections

thumbs-up

1

Similar questions

Q. Statement: Should persons convicted of criminal offences in the past be allowed to contest elections in India?
Arguments:
I. No. Such persons cannot serve the cause of the people and country.
II. Yes. It is democracy-let people decide whom to vote.

Q. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument or which is a weak argument.

Statement: Should higher education be restricted only to the most deserving ones?
Arguments: I. No, it is against the principle of democracy.

II. Yes, only deserving people are entitled to this luxury.

The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument or which is a weak argument.

Statement: Should all news be controlled by Government in a democracy?
Arguments: I. Yes, Variety of news only confuses people.
II. No, Controlled news loses credibility.

The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument or which is a weak argument.

Statement: Should there be a woman President in India?
Arguments: I. Yes, only then the suffering of women will be stopped.
II. No, a woman is not capable of ruling a vast country like India.

Q. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument.

Statement: Should the institution of marriages be abolished?

Arguments: I. Yes, it is expensive and therefore it is beyond the means of most people in our country.
II. No, it is necessary for the survival of the society.

View More

Join BYJU'S Learning Program

similar_icon

Related Videos

lock

Arguments Against Democracy

CIVICS

Watch in App

explore_more_icon

Explore more

Arguments Against Democracy

Standard IX Civics

Join BYJU'S Learning Program

CrossIcon