Statement : Should public meeting and conferences be banned in the country ?
Arg. I : Yes, it is the place where, opponents are abused.
Arg. II : No, it is against fundamental rights given to citizens of India.

Only I is strong

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Only argument II is strong

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

Both the arguments are strong

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Neither I nor II is strong

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is A Only argument II is strong
Right to freedom of expression is a fundamental right. so argument II is strong but argument I is weak because it rarely happens that opponents are abused in public meeting and conferences.

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

Statement: Should non-vegetarian food be totally banned in our country?

Arguments:

I. Yes. It is expensive and therefore it is beyond the means of most people in our country.

II. No. Nothing should be banned in a democratic country like ours.

Statement:Should military service be made compulsory in our country?

Argument:

I. No, it is against the policy of non-violence.

II. Yes, every citizen should protect his country.

Join BYJU'S Learning Program