Statement: Should system of offering jobs only to the wards of government employees be introduced in all government offices in India?
Arguments:
I. No. It denies opportunity to many deserving individuals and government may stand to lose in the long run.
II. No. It is against the principle of equality, does not government owe its responsibility to all its citizens?

Only argument I is strong

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Only argument II is strong

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Either I or II is strong

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Neither I nor II is strong

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Both I and II are strong

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is E Both I and II are strong
Merit, fair selection and equal opportunities for all - these three factors, if taken care of, can help government recruit competent officials and also fulfill the objectives of the Constitution. Thus, both the arguments hold strong.

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

Statement:Should system of offering jobs only to the wards of government employees be introduced in all government offices in India?

Argument:

I. No, it denies opportunity to many deserving individuals and government may stand to lose in the long run.

II. No, it is against the principle of equality. Does not government owe its responsibility to all its citizens?

Q. Statement: Should system of offering jobs only to the wards of government employees be introduced in all government offices in India?
Arguments:
I. No. It denies oppurtunity to many deserving individuals and government may stand to lose in the long run.
II. No. It is against the principle of equality, does not government owe its responsibility to all its citizens?

The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument or which is a weak argument.

Statement: Should all news be controlled by Government in a democracy?
Arguments: I. Yes, Variety of news only confuses people.
II. No, Controlled news loses credibility.

Q. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument or which is a weak argument.

Statement: Should higher education be restricted only to the most deserving ones?
Arguments: I. No, it is against the principle of democracy.

II. Yes, only deserving people are entitled to this luxury.

Statement:Should the practice of transfers of clerical cadre employees from government offices of one city to those of another be stopped?

Argument:

I. No, transfer of employees is a routine administrative matter and we must continue it.
II. Yes, it involves lot of governmental expenditure and inconvenience too many compared to the benefits it yields.

Join BYJU'S Learning Program

The correct option is E Both I and II are strongMerit, fair selection and equal opportunities for all - these three factors, if taken care of, can help government recruit competent officials and also fulfill the objectives of the Constitution. Thus, both the arguments hold strong.

The correct option is E Both I and II are strong
Merit, fair selection and equal opportunities for all - these three factors, if taken care of, can help government recruit competent officials and also fulfill the objectives of the Constitution. Thus, both the arguments hold strong.