Statement: Should the consumption of aerated drinks be banned in India?
Arguments:
I. Yes. This is the only way to reduce the risk of exposing people to some diseases.
II. No. Each individual should have right to choose what he wants.
III. No. There is no confirmed evidence that such products have adverse effects on human body.
IV. Yes. It is banned in many other countries also.

Only I is strong

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Only I and II are strong

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Only III is strong

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

Only I and IV are strong

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

All are strong

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is B Only III is strong
The use of 'only' in I makes it invalid. Also, it is the duty of the government to save its citizens from intake of any harmful products, even if they like them. So, II does not hold strong. Besides, a product must not be banned unless its harmful effects have been proved. So, III holds strong. Lastly, we cannot blindly follow the decisions taken by other countries. So, IV also does not hold.

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

Statement: Should non-vegetarian food be totally banned in our country?

Arguments:

I. Yes. It is expensive and therefore it is beyond the means of most people in our country.

II. No. Nothing should be banned in a democratic country like ours.

Statement: Should there be a complete ban on sale of soft drinks within the premises of all the schools in India?

Arguments:

I. Yes, this will considerably decrease the consumption of such drinks by the school children as these contain harmful chemicals.

II. No, the authorities do not have right to impose such restriction in a democratic country.

Join BYJU'S Learning Program