CameraIcon
CameraIcon
SearchIcon
MyQuestionIcon
MyQuestionIcon
1
You visited us 1 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!
Question

Statements: No rabbit is lion. Some horses are lions. All rabbits are tables.
Conclusions:
I. Some tables are lions.
II. Some horses are rabbits.
III. No lion is table.

A
None follows
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
B
Only either I or III follows
Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses
C
Only II and III follow
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
D
Only III follows
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
E
None of these
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
Open in App
Solution

The correct option is B Only either I or III follows
Some horses are lions. No rabbit is lion.
Since one premise is particular and the other negative, the conclusion must be particular negative (O-type) and should not contain the middle term.
So, it follows that 'Some horses are not rabbits'.
All rabbits are tables. No rabbit is lion.
Since the middle term 'rabbits' is distributed twice, the conclusion must be particular.
Since one premise is negative, the conclusion must be negative. So, it follows that 'Some tables are not lions'. Since I and III involve the same terms and form a complementary pair, so either I or III follows.

flag
Suggest Corrections
thumbs-up
0
similar_icon
Similar questions
View More
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
similar_icon
Related Videos
thumbnail
lock
Population Interactions
BIOLOGY
Watch in App
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
CrossIcon