wiz-icon
MyQuestionIcon
MyQuestionIcon
1
You visited us 1 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!
Question

Supreme Court held that Preamble as a basic feature of Constitution cannot be amended in the case of ____________________.

A
Golaknath v.State of Punjab
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
B
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
C
S.R. Bommai v Union of Inida
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
D
Kesavananda Bharti v State of Kerala
Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses
Open in App
Solution

The correct option is C Kesavananda Bharti v State of Kerala
Kesavanand Bharti v State of Kerala in which it was held that Preamble is a part of the Constitution and is subject to the amending power of the parliament as any other provisions of the Constitution, provided the basic structure of the constitution is not destroyed.
Hence, D is the correct option.

flag
Suggest Corrections
thumbs-up
0
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
similar_icon
Related Videos
thumbnail
lock
Democracy and Rights
CIVICS
Watch in App
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
CrossIcon