Question

Supreme Court held that Preamble as a basic feature of Constitution cannot be amended in the case of ____________________.

• A. Golaknath v.State of Punjab
• B. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
• C. S.R. Bommai v Union of Inida
• D. Kesavananda Bharti v State of Kerala

Answer 1

Answer: (D)

Kesavananda Bharti v State of Kerala

Kesavanand Bharti v State of Kerala in which it was held that Preamble is a part of the Constitution and is subject to the amending power of the parliament as any other provisions of the Constitution, provided the basic structure of the constitution is not destroyed.

Hence, D is the correct option.