wiz-icon
MyQuestionIcon
MyQuestionIcon
2
You visited us 2 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!
Question

The case of Rylands vs. Fletcher has laid down the principle of _______________.

A
defamation
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
B
conspiracy
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
C
strict liability of the land owner
Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses
D
none of the above
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
Open in App
Solution

The correct option is D strict liability of the land owner
Strict Liability can be defined as a standard of liability under which a person is legally responsible for the consequences flowing from an activity even in the absence of fault or criminal intent on the part of the defendant. Under the rule in Rylands vs. Fletcher, it was established that if an individual who allows a dangerous element on his land which, if it escapes and damages a neighbour, is liable on a strict liability basis which means that it is not necessary to prove negligence on the part of the landowner from where the dangerous substance has escaped.

flag
Suggest Corrections
thumbs-up
0
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
similar_icon
Related Videos
thumbnail
lock
Introduction to Consumer Protection
BUSINESS STUDIES
Watch in App
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
CrossIcon