CameraIcon
CameraIcon
SearchIcon
MyQuestionIcon
MyQuestionIcon
1
You visited us 1 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!
Question

The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution protects citizens against unreasonable searches and siezures. No search of a person's home or personal effects may be conducted without a written search warrant issued on probable cause. This means that a neutral judge must approve the factual bases justifying a search before it can be conducted.
This paragraph best supports the statement that the police cannot search person's home or private papers unless they have

A
legal authorization
Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses
B
direct evidence of a crime.
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
C
read the person his or her constitutional rights.
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
D
a reasonable belief that a crime has occurred
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
E
requested that a judge be present.
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
Open in App
Solution

The correct option is A legal authorization
The second and third sentence combine to give support to choice a. The statement stresses that there must be a judge's approval (i.e., legal authorization) before a search can be conducted. Choices b and d are wrong because it is not enough for the police to have direct evidence or a reasonable belief a judge must authorize the search for it to be legal. Choices c and e are not mentioned in the passage.

flag
Suggest Corrections
thumbs-up
0
similar_icon
Similar questions
View More
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
similar_icon
Related Videos
thumbnail
lock
The Public Prosecutor
CIVICS
Watch in App
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
CrossIcon