The predecessor of a two digit number is never a single digit number.

True

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

False

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is B False
Consider the whole number the predecessor of a two digit number,

We know that, whole numbers are, $0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, . . . . . . . . \infty$

Hence, the predecessor of a two digit number is $= 9$

Hence, this is the answer.

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

Question 8(g)

Check whether the following statement is true (T) or false (F):
The predecessor of a two digit number is never a single digit number.

Which of the following statements are true (T) and which are false (F)?

(a) Zero is the smallest natural number.

(b) 400 is the predecessor of 399.

(d) 600 is the successor of 599.

(e) All natural numbers are whole numbers.

(f) All whole numbers are natural numbers.

(g) The predecessor of a two digit number is never a single digit number.

(h) 1 is the smallest whole number.

(i) The natural number 1 has no predecessor.

(j) The whole number 1 has no predecessor.

(k) The whole number 13 lies between 11 and 12.

(l) The whole number 0 has no predecessor.

(m) The successor of a two digit number is always a two digit number.

Join BYJU'S Learning Program