1
Question
The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument.
Statement : Should government stop spending huge amounts of money on international sports?
Arguments : I. Yes, This money can be utilised for upliftment of the poor.
II. No, Sportspersons will be frustrated and will not get international exposure.
The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument.
Arguments : I. Yes, This money can be utilised for upliftment of the poor.
II. No, Sportspersons will be frustrated and will not get international exposure.
II. No, Sportspersons will be frustrated and will not get international exposure.
Open in App
Solution
The correct option is B Argument II is strong
Clearly, spending money on sports cannot be avoided merely because it can be spent on socio-economic problems. So, argument I does not hold. Also, if the expenses on sports are curtailed, the sports persons would face lack of facilities and training and our country will lag behind in the international sports competitions. So, II holds.Hence option B is correct.
Clearly, spending money on sports cannot be avoided merely because it can be spent on socio-economic problems. So, argument I does not hold. Also, if the expenses on sports are curtailed, the sports persons would face lack of facilities and training and our country will lag behind in the international sports competitions. So, II holds.
Hence option B is correct.
Suggest Corrections
0
Similar questions
View More
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
Explore more
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
