CameraIcon
CameraIcon
SearchIcon
MyQuestionIcon
MyQuestionIcon
316
You visited us 316 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!
Question

The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument.

Statement : Should government stop spending huge amounts of money on international sports?
Arguments : I. Yes, This money can be utilised for upliftment of the poor.
II. No, Sportspersons will be frustrated and will not get international exposure.

A
Argument I is strong
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
B
Argument II is strong
Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses
C
Either I or II is strong
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
D
Neither I nor II is strong
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
E
Both I and II are strong
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
Open in App
Solution

The correct option is B Argument II is strong
Clearly, spending money on sports cannot be avoided merely because it can be spent on socio-economic problems. So, argument I does not hold. Also, if the expenses on sports are curtailed, the sports persons would face lack of facilities and training and our country will lag behind in the international sports competitions. So, II holds.
Hence option B is correct.

flag
Suggest Corrections
thumbs-up
0
similar_icon
Similar questions
View More
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
similar_icon
Related Videos
thumbnail
lock
Wealth of an Economy
ECONOMICS
Watch in App
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
CrossIcon