The correct option is C 0.30 cm/h
Total rainfall=0.5 + 2.8 + 1.6 = 4.9 cm
Surface runoff = 3.2 cm
Infiltration = 4.9 — 3.2 = 1.7 cm
Time of rainfall = 6 hr
If infiltration is assumed constant, infiltration rate will be
1.76=0.28 cm/hr
But this infiltration rate cannot be possible throughout the time period of 6 hrs because
From 0-2 hr :
rainfall rate = 0.52=.25 cm/hr
which is lesser than infiltration rate and infiltration rate cannot be more than rainfall rate.
Now, taking time period from 2 to 6 hrs
Excess rainfall duration = 6 - 2 = 4 hrs
Total rainfall = 2.8 + 1.6 = 4.4 cm
Surface runoff = 3.2 cm
(because from 0 - 2 hrs, storm will not contribute in surface runoff)
Infiltration = 4.4 - 3.2 = 1.2 cm
ϕ−index=Infiltrationte=1.24
= 0.30 cm/h
For t = 2 to 4 hrs,
Rainfall intensity =2.82=1.4 cm/hr>ϕ
For t = 4 to 6 hrs,
Rainfall intensity =1.62=0.8 cm/h>ϕ
Hence
ϕ−index=0.3 cm/h
Alternative approach
Total rainfall = 0.5 + 2.8 + 1.6 = 4.9 cm
Total runoff = 3.2 cm
Time of rainfall = 6 hours
Considering whole period of rainfall to be period of rainfall excess.
⇒ϕ−index=4.9−3.26=0.283cm/h
ϕ−index denotes losses and it cannot be greater than rainfall intensity. The intensities of rainfall are 0.25 cm/h, 1.4 cm/h and 0.8 cm/h for the three storms. Out of these, 0.25 cm/h is lesser than ϕ−index obtained. Hence it is not the period of rainfall excess.
Again, considering the other two rainfall excess,
⇒ϕ−index=2.8+1.6−3.24
= 0.3 cm/h