wiz-icon
MyQuestionIcon
MyQuestionIcon
1
You visited us 1 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!
Question

The Supreme Court in ____________ case held that Article 21 does not include right to die.

A
P. Rathinam/ Nagabhusan Patnaik vs. Union of India
Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses
B
Dr. M. Ismail Faruqui vs. Union of India
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
C
K. Karunakaran vs. State of U.P.
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
D
None of the above
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
Open in App
Solution

The correct option is A P. Rathinam/ Nagabhusan Patnaik vs. Union of India
In P. Rathinam v Union of India case, the Supreme court decided that euthanasia is not legally valid in the state of India. It's an offence. Right to live doesn't enumerate right to die. It's a different concept. Mercy killing is void as of justice .

flag
Suggest Corrections
thumbs-up
1
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
similar_icon
Related Videos
thumbnail
lock
Mathematical Statements
MATHEMATICS
Watch in App
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
CrossIcon