wiz-icon
MyQuestionIcon
MyQuestionIcon
1
You visited us 1 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!
Question

The Supreme Court observed that Parliamentary privileges are not subject to fundamental rights in case of

A
Ganpati v. Hafisul Hasan (Blitz case)
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
B
M.S.M. Sharma v. Sinha (Search Light case)
Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses
C
Keshav Singh v. Speaker, U.P
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
D
Prabhat case
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
Open in App
Solution

The correct option is B M.S.M. Sharma v. Sinha (Search Light case)
This case was decided on December 12, 1958. This was a milestone decision on Parliamentary privileges
In this case the editor of "Search Light" newspaper, Patna moved to the court under article 32 of the Indian constitution saying that he has the freedom of speech under article 19(1) (a) and that it was his fundamental right which was inviolable and the speaker's order was restriction to his right to freedom of speech under article 19(1)(a)
When the high court gave his decision in favour of the Speaker, then the editor went to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court issued a statement which said that the Speaker is the law in the house and his law has to be obeyed on any material got from his house.

flag
Suggest Corrections
thumbs-up
0
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
similar_icon
Related Videos
thumbnail
lock
Powers of the Lok Sabha
CIVICS
Watch in App
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
CrossIcon