wiz-icon
MyQuestionIcon
MyQuestionIcon
1
You visited us 1 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!
Question

The United States became an imperialist nation in the late 1800s for all the following reasons except:

A
Desire to establish new markets for U.S. goods
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
B
Interest in acquiring naval bases in strategic locations
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
C
Need to obtain inexpensive access to certain goods that the United States could not produce for itself, such as sugar and rubber
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
D
Desire to put an end to tyranny in foreign nations
Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses
E
Wish to be considered a powerful force in world affairs
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
Open in App
Solution

The correct option is E Desire to put an end to tyranny in foreign nations

The United States did not depose any foreign tyrants for another hundred years. This was never a goal of late nineteenth-century imperialism.


flag
Suggest Corrections
thumbs-up
0
similar_icon
Similar questions
Q. As the economic role of multinational, global corporations expands, the international economic environment will be shaped increasingly not by governments or international institutions, but by the interaction between governments and global corporations, especially in the United States, Europe, and Japan. A significant factor in this shifting world economy is the trend toward regional trading blocs of nations, which has a potentially large effect on the evolution of the world trading system. Two examples of this trend are the United States-Canada Free Trade Agreement (FTA) and Europe 1992, the move by the European Community (EC) to dismantle impediments to the free flow of goods, services, capital, and labor among member states by the end of 1992. However, although numerous political and economic factors were operative in launching the move to integrate the EC’s markets, concern about protectionism within the EC does not appear to have been a major consideration. This is in sharp contrast to the FTA; the overwhelming reason for that bilateral initiative was fear of increasing United States protectionism. Nonetheless, although markedly different in origin and nature, both regional developments are highly significant in that they will foster integration in the two largest and richest markets of the world, as well as provoke questions about the future direction of the world trading system.
Q. According to the passage, all of the following are elements of the shifting world economy EXCEPT
View More
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
similar_icon
Related Videos
thumbnail
lock
The Land that Was India
HISTORY
Watch in App
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
CrossIcon