There are countries where one political party dominates the elections each time. Such elections are often deemed as being unfair by observers in countries that possess multi-party systems. With regard to this, pick the odd one out:

China

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Myanmar

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Libya

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

India

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is D India
In countries like China, Myanmar, and Libya, one political party dominates the elections. Only one party competes in the election, and hence, the elections are not entirely free and fair in such countries, owing to the lack of options for a voting citizen. In India, two or more parties compete in the elections and the winning party/parties come to power based on the number of votes received. This is often regarded as a fairer means of electing leaders, where the citizens get a better chance to choose their leaders.

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

Q. There are countries where one political party dominates the elections each time. Such elections are often deemed as being unfair by observers in countries that possess multi-party systems. With regard to this, pick the odd one out:

Q. Four statements regarding one-party dominance are given below. Mark each of them as true or false.

(a) One-party dominance is rooted in the absence of strong alternative political parties.
(b) One-party dominance occurs because of weak public opinion.
(c) One-party dominance is linked to the nation’s colonial past.
(d) One-party dominance reflects the absence of democratic ideals in a country.

A former Chief Election Commissioner joined a political party and contested elections. There are various views on this issue. One view is that a former Election Commissioner is an independent citizen and has a right to join any political party and to contest election. According to the other view, leaving this possibility open can affect the impartiality of the Election Commission. So, former Election Commissioners must not be allowed to contest any elections. Which position do you agree with and why?

Here is some information about the four countries. Based on this information, how would you classify each of these countries? Write ‘democratic’, ‘undemocratic’, or ‘not sure’ against each of these.

(a)Country A: People who do not accept the country’s official religion do not have a right to vote.

(b)Country B: The same party has been winning elections for the last twenty years.

(c)Country C: The ruling party has lost in the last three elections.

(d)Country D: There is no independent election commission.

Q. Single party systems cannot claim to be democratic. This is true about numerous such countries. One of the following has a single party system.

Join BYJU'S Learning Program