The correct option is
E Either of the Statements I and II is sufficient
First, set up an RTW chart:
Recall that the question is "Is m<n?"
(1): SUFFICIENT. Find out how much time it would take for the task to be performed with both Mary and Nancy working:
(1m+1n)t=1
(m+nmn)t=1
t=mnm+n
Now, set up the inequality described in the statement (that is, twice this time is greater than m):
2t>m
2(mnm+n)>m
2mn>mn+m2Youcancrossmultiplybym + nbecausem _ n$ is positive.
mn>m2
n>m You can divide by m because m is positive.
Alternatively, you can rearrange the original inequality thus:
t>m2
If both Mary and Nancy worked at Mary's rate, then together, they would complete the task in m2 hours. Since the actual time is longer, Nancy must work more slowly than Mary, and thus n>m.
(2): SUFFICIENT. You can reuse the computation of t, the time needed for the task to be jointly performed:
2t<n
2(mnm+n)<n
2mn<nm+n2 Again, you can cross multiply by m+n because m+n is positive.
mn<n2
m<n You can divide by n because n is positive.
Alternatively, you can rearrange the original inequality thus:
t<n2
If both Mary and Nancy worked at Nancy's rate, then together, they would complete the task n2 hours. Since the actual time is shorter, Mary must work faster than Nancy, and thus m<n.