'Utilitarians believe that the right action is that which produces the most happiness.'
Which of the following claims is incompatible with the utilitarian view?

The right thing to do is to make the consequences of our actions as good as possible.

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

The right thing to do is to do our duty, whatever the consequences.

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

The right thing to do is to act on a rule which, if followed widely, produces the most happiness.

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

The right thing to do is to act from motivations which produce the most happiness.

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is B The right thing to do is to do our duty, whatever the consequences.
Option (b) states that one should do one's duty without giving any consideration to the consequences (happiness of misery ). Thus , option (b) is incompatible with the belief of Utilitarians.

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

Q. In Ursula LeGuin’s short story "The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas," everyone in the city of Omelas is happy — everyone, that is, except the child who is kept locked in a basement closet. The child is left entirely alone and neglected except for occasional visits from the citizens of Omelas. They come at a certain age as a rite of initiation, to learn the secret of the happiness they enjoy. They come to learn that their happiness has a price: the suffering of an innocent child. In the end, most people stay in Omelas; but a few, unable to bear the fact that they are responsible for the suffering of that child, reject this utopia built upon a utilitarian morality.
Utilitarianism is an ethical theory based upon the belief that happiness is the ultimate good and that people should use happiness as the measure for determining right and wrong. For utilitarian, the right thing to do is that which will bring about the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. Furthermore, utilitarianism argues that the intention of peoples actions does not matter; only the consequences of their actions are morally relevant, because only the consequences determine how much happiness is produced.
Although many useful social policies and much legislation are founded on this "greatest good" philosophy, utilitarianism can be problematic as a basis for morality.
First, happiness is not so easy to quantify, and any measurement is bound to be subjective. Second, in a theory that treats everything except happiness as instrumentally rather than intrinsically valuable, anything or, more importantly, anyone can (and should) be treated as a means to an end, if it means greater happiness. This rejects the notion that human beings have their own intrinsic value. Further, utilitarianism puts the burden of the happiness of the masses on the suffering of the few. Is the happiness of many worth the suffering of a few? Why do those few deserve to suffer? Isn’t this burden of suffering morally irresponsible? This is the dilemma so brilliantly illustrated in LeGuins story.

Utilitarianism has given rise to many good social policies and legislation.
Utilitarianism is an ethical theory based upon the belief that happiness is the ultimate good, even if that causes suffering for a few.
The idea of utilitarianism is cruel, abhorrent and unacceptable.
Utilitarianism is a useful but morally problematic theory.

Q. Which are the things that make you happy?
In what ways do you show your happiness?

Q. Essayist: Only happiness is intrinsically valuable; other things are valuable only insofar as they contribute to happiness. Some philosophers argue that the fact that we do not approve of a bad person’s being happy shows that we value happiness only when it is deserved. This supposedly shows that we find something besides happiness to be intrinsically valuable. But the happiness people deserve is determined by the amount of happiness they bring to others. Therefore, ___
Which one of the following most logically completes the final sentence of the essayist’s argument?

Q. The utilitarians state that the system of property rights is necessary if the individuals are to achieve a sense of happiness.

A. So much of our day-to-day focus seems to be on getting things done, trudging our way through the tasks of living—it can feel like a treadmill that gets you nowhere; where is the childlike joy?

B. We are not doing the things that make us happy; that which brings us joy; the things that we cannot wait to do because we enjoy them so much.

C. This is the stuff that joyful living is made of—identifying your calling and committing yourself wholeheartedly to it.

D. When this happens, each moment becomes a celebration of you; there is a rush of energy that comes with feeling completely immersed in doing what you love most.

Join BYJU'S Learning Program

'Utilitarians believe that the right action is that which produces the most happiness.' Which of the following claims is incompatible with the utilitarian view?

The correct option is B The right thing to do is to do our duty, whatever the consequences.Option (b) states that one should do one's duty without giving any consideration to the consequences (happiness of misery ). Thus , option (b) is incompatible with the belief of Utilitarians.

'Utilitarians believe that the right action is that which produces the most happiness.'
Which of the following claims is incompatible with the utilitarian view?

The correct option is B The right thing to do is to do our duty, whatever the consequences.
Option (b) states that one should do one's duty without giving any consideration to the consequences (happiness of misery ). Thus , option (b) is incompatible with the belief of Utilitarians.