wiz-icon
MyQuestionIcon
MyQuestionIcon
1
You visited us 1 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!
Question

What compounds the situation is that political bosses try to exert their influence and protect the culprits.
A. It is also beyond doubt that substantial part of that money was deposited in Swiss banks.
B.The undisputed fact about that transaction is that a huge amount was paid as kickbacks to secure the contract.
C.What was important was to fix the identity of the recipients.
D.This became evident in the murky Bofors gun transaction.
6.A number of persons in public life and media pointed their finger of complicity at an important figure

A

DBAC

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses
B

DBCA

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
C

DABC

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
D

BACD

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
Open in App
Solution

The correct option is A

DBAC


The situation described in sentence 1 is exemplifies in D.So only sentence D can follow1.B is a continuation of D, because 'that transaction' in B refers to Bofors in D

flag
Suggest Corrections
thumbs-up
0
similar_icon
Similar questions
Q. Given below is a statement of legal principle followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts given below and select the most appropriate answer.
Legal Principle: Contract is an agreement freely entered into between the parties. But when consent to an agreement is obtained to undue influence, the contract is voidable at the option of the party whose consent was so obtained.
Factual Situation: The pragya had been worked for a business man Anurag since the age of 18, working for a range of Anurag's businesses. In 2000, (aged 21) Pragya purchased a flat. In 2005, Mr. Anurag's business was facing financial difficulties, and he asked Pragya to offe up her flat as financial security against an overdraft facility for the business. In July of that year, the banks solicitors wrote to Pragya, advising that she should take Independent legal advice before putting her property up as a security for the debt. The bank also notified Pragya that the guarantee was unlimited in both time and financial amount. Having discussed the arrangement with Anurag, Pragya was unaware of the extent of the borrowing, but was assured that her mortgage would not be called upon, and that his own properties which were also used as security would be looked at first. A charge was executed over the Pragya's property in August 2005. In 2009, Mr.s Anurag's business went into liquidation and the bank formally demanded Rs.60,24,912 from Pragya. Pragya raised the defence of undue influence - stating that Mr. Anurag had induced her to enter into the agreement, and the bank had full knowledge/ notice of this undue influence which should set aside the banks right to enforce the debt recovery against Pragya. Bank is contending that there is no undue influence.
Whether the consent to offer the flat as financial security obtained through undue influence?
View More
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
similar_icon
Related Videos
thumbnail
lock
Barter System
ECONOMICS
Watch in App
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
CrossIcon