What could be the repercussion if right to constitutional remedy was not there in the Constitution?

Protection against violation of fundamental rights would not be there.

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

Right to freedom would be more effective.

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Other fundamental rights would also be not there.

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Right to liberty would be more effective.

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is A Protection against violation of fundamental rights would not be there.
Right to constitutional remedy ensures that the other fundamental rights of an individual are not violated or encroached upon by anyone by having the provisions for individual to approach the court.

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

74. Which the following statements are true with reference to 'Right to the Constitutional Remedies'?

1. An aggrieved person can approach the Supreme Court under ‘Right to Constitutional Remedies’ if any of the Constitutional Rights are violated.

2. Article 32 cannot be abridged by the Parliament.

Options:

Join BYJU'S Learning Program