wiz-icon
MyQuestionIcon
MyQuestionIcon
1
You visited us 1 times! Enjoying our articles? Unlock Full Access!
Question

When a worker is working in an institution where he/she is not adding any real value to output, we have unemployment.

A
disguised
Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses
B
seasonal
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
C
educated
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
D
classical
No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!
Open in App
Solution

The correct option is A disguised
This is the phenomenon of disguised unemployment. Here, a worker is employed but does not add any real value to production. It is often seen in agriculture, where an entire family may be working on a single farm.

flag
Suggest Corrections
thumbs-up
0
similar_icon
Similar questions
Q. Identify the tone of the passage.
Since the early 1970’s, historians have begun to devote serious attention to the working class in the United States. Yet while we now have studies of working-class communities and culture, we know remarkably little of worklessness. When historians have paid any attention at all to unemployment, they have focused on the Great Depression of the 1930’s. The narrowness of this perspective ignores the pervasive recessions and joblessness of the previous decades, as Alexander Keyssar shows in his recent book. Examining the period 1870-1920, Keyssar concentrates on Massachusetts, where the historical materials are particularly rich, and the findings applicable to other industrial areas.

The unemployment rates that Keyssar calculates appear to be relatively modest, at least by Great Depression standards: during the worst years, in the 1870’s and 1890’s, unemployment was around 15 percent. Yet Keyssar rightly understands that a better way to measure the impact of unemployment is to calculate unemployment frequencies—measuring the percentage of workers who experience any unemployment in the course of a year. Given this perspective, joblessness looms much larger.

Keyssar also scrutinizes unemployment patterns according to skill level, ethnicity, race, age, class, and gender. He finds that rates of joblessness differed primarily according to class: those in middle-class and white-collar occupations were far less likely to be unemployed. Yet the impact of unemployment on a specific class was not always the same. Even when dependent on the same trade, adjoining communities could have dramatically different unemployment rates. Keyssar uses these differential rates to help explain a phenomenon that has puzzled historians—the startlingly high rate of geographical mobility in the nineteenth-century United States. But mobility was not the dominant working-class strategy for coping with unemployment, nor was assistance from private charities or state agencies. Self-help and the help of kin got most workers through jobless spells.
View More
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
similar_icon
Related Videos
thumbnail
lock
Participation in Employment
ECONOMICS
Watch in App
Join BYJU'S Learning Program
CrossIcon