When an object falls from a height, the distance s (metres), it travels in time t (seconds) is given by the equation s = 4.9t². Is the distance travelled proportional to time?

Open in App

Solution

The equation of distance travelled is given by s = 4.9t²

The above equation is not of the form y = kx, where k is the constant of proportionality.

Thus, the distance travelled is not proportional to the time taken.

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

The distance travelled by an object thrown upwards in t seconds is 30t − 4.9t² metres. After how much time would it fall down? At what all times would it be 20 metres above the ground?

When an object falls from a height, its speed, v metres per second after t seconds of fall, is given by the equation v = 9.8 t. Is the speed proportional to the time?

Q. When the distance an object travels is directly proportional to the time, it is said to travel with

Q. The distance, s metres, which a falling body covers in time t seconds, is 4.8 times the square of the time t. Rewrite the above information as an equation in s and t.

Q. When the distance an object travels is directly proportional to the interval of time taken, it is said to travel with :

Join BYJU'S Learning Program

When an object falls from a height, the distance s (metres), it travels in time t (seconds) is given by the equation s = 4.9t2. Is the distance travelled proportional to time?

The equation of distance travelled is given by s = 4.9t2 The above equation is not of the form y = kx, where k is the constant of proportionality. Thus, the distance travelled is not proportional to the time taken.

When an object falls from a height, the distance s (metres), it travels in time t (seconds) is given by the equation s = 4.9t². Is the distance travelled proportional to time?

The equation of distance travelled is given by s = 4.9t²

The above equation is not of the form y = kx, where k is the constant of proportionality.

Thus, the distance travelled is not proportional to the time taken.