When it comes to foreign policy, there really are two Americas. The divisions are at their sharpest over Iraq, but they extend much further. Should America put the “war on terrorism” at the heart of its foreign policy or treat it as just one concern among many? Should America bomb Iran or allow Iran to get the bomb?__________________________

Should it allow the Republicans to pick up the cudgels on behalf of the democrats ?

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Should it implicate the hardliners and let go of fence-sitters ?

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Should it negotiate with its enemies or wait for them to mend their ways ?

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Should it remain as expected- a dyed-in-the-wool realistic nation or turn into a nation with rightist convictions?

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

These deep divisions are the legacy of a man whose name will not appear on the ballot in November.

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is D Should it remain as expected- a dyed-in-the-wool realistic nation or turn into a nation with rightist convictions?
Option (d)

‘d’ is the correct option since it is obviously a question from the same set of sentiments, which deal with the dilemma that America faces. It deals with foreign policy. ‘a’, ‘c’ and ‘e’ are conveying different types of dilemma but away from foreign policy. ‘b’ can come later but it does not immediately continue the idea left off in the paragraph.

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

Q. Write an essay for or against the following proposition: ‘With the disintegration of the second world, India should change its foreign policy and focus more on friendship with the US rather than with traditional friends like Russia’.

Q. According to the National Forest Policy, a region should have _____ of its land under forest.

"I've heard many reasons why our nation should reduce its reliance on petroleum vehicle fuels. One is that relying on imported oil makes our economy dependent on the political whims of foreign rulers. Another is that other energy sources, like the possibility of hydrogen based fuels, are less harmful to the environment. And a third is that petroleum is not a renewable resource so when we've used it all up, it will be gone! But I don't think we're likely to use it all up for at least another fifty years. And by then we'll have invented new and better fuels and more fuel-efficient vehicles too. So that argument doesn't worry me. And I don't really believe the stuff about how foreign leaders can force our nation to change its policies simply by decreasing their oil production. Oil companies like Exxon have made record profits precisely in those times when the supply of foreign oil was reduced. I don't see the big oil companies being very interested in policy change when the money is rolling in. And for another, our nation has demonstrated that it is willing to wage war rather than to permit foreign leaders to push us around. So this whole thing about how we have to reduce our reliance on petroleum based gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel is bogus."

The speaker's reasoning is best evaluated as

A screw has a pitch equal to 0.5 mm. What should be the number of divisions on its head so as to read correct up to 0.001 mm with its help ?

Q. There are so many problems in integration where we can solve it by using many methods. But there are also other problems which can only be solved using a particular method. I get confused when I see the problem as to how I should solve it. Is there any way through which we can make out which method should be used to solve the problem. Or is practice the only way of attaining that mastery???

Join BYJU'S Learning Program