Which of the following are equivalent statements to the implication p→q.
∼q→∼p
p only if q
p is a sufficient condition for q
q is a necessary condition for p
Let's analyze the question by looking at the truth table of the implication.
From the truth table its clear that p→q is equivalent to ∼q→∼p.
Let's consider option (d). s1: "q is a necessary condition for p” which means for an implication of truth value T, q has to be necessarily 'T' for the value of p to be 'T'. And if it's not so implication assumes value 'F'.
In option (c) s2: "p is a sufficient condition for q”. We can check this by seeing that for implications a truth value of T for p is ensuring a truth value T for q also. If its ensured truth value of implication is T or else F.
Option (b) is only a rephrased version of option (d).