Which of the following cases held the Right of Privacy as a fundamental right?

Maneka Gnadhi v. Union of India

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Kharak Singh case

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

K.S. Puttaswamy(Justice Retd.) v. Union of India

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

A.K. Gopalan v. Union of India

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is C K.S. Puttaswamy(Justice Retd.) v. Union of India
Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anr. vs Union Of India And Ors is a landmark judgment of the Supreme Court of India, which holds that the right to privacy is protected as a fundamental constitutional right under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

6. Consider the following statements,

1] NOTA was introduced in India following the 2013 Supreme Court directive in the People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India judgment.

2] India became the 14th country to institute negative voting.

3] Significantly, NOTA in India does not provide for a ‘right to reject’.

Which of the above statements is/are correct?

A: The Union of India was organised into 14 states and 6 union territories in 1948.

B: As of 2020, India has 29 states and 8 union territories.

Which of these is(are) are true?

Join BYJU'S Learning Program