Which of these is not a valid reason for arguing that there is a lesser possibility of famine in a democratic country?

Opposition parties can draw attention to hunger and starvation.

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Free press can report suffering from famine in different parts of the country.

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

Government fears its defeat in the next elections.

No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today!

People are free to believe in and practise any religion.

Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses

Open in App

Solution

The correct option is D People are free to believe in and practise any religion.
Option d is not a valid reason for arguing that there is a lesser possibility of famine in a democratic country. This is because practising a religion has nothing to do with preventing famine.

Suggest Corrections

Similar questions

Which of these is not a valid reason for arguing that there is a lesser possibility of famine in a democratic country?

(a) Opposition parties can draw attention to hunger and starvation.

(b) Free press can report suffering from famine in different parts of the country.

(d) People are free to believe in and practise any religion.

- Cause of the disaster, date and time

- What kind of damage did it cause – to lives, belongings,livelihoods?

- Which people came forward to help? Which government offices or other groups?

If there is no rain, crops can fail and there can be a drought. But food for people can be brought from other places so that there is no famine, which means people don’t have to stay hungry, and they don’t die of hunger.

Have people in your area ever got affected by famine or drought? Find such reports of different countries from newspapers. Make your own report.
You may need some help from these in case of an accident or emergency. Find out and write their addresses and phone numbers. Add more names to this list.

	Address	Phone Number
Fire Station	________________	________________
Nearby Hospital	________________	________________
Ambulance	________________	________________
Police Station	________________	________________

Can we draw the following conclusions from the information given in this chapter? Give two facts to support your position for each of these.

(a) Election Commission of India does not have enough powers to conduct free and fair elections in the country.

(b) There is a high level of popular participation in the elections in our country.

(d) Many reforms are needed to make our elections completely free and fair.

A petition by a human rights group drew attention of the court to the condition of starvation and hunger in the country. Over five crore tonnes of food grains was stored in the godowns of the Food Corporation of India. Research shows that a large number of ration cardholders do not know about the quantity of food grains they can purchase from fair price shops. It requested the court to order the government to improve its public distribution system.

a. Which different rights does this case involve? How are these rights interlinked?

b. Should these rights form part of the right to life?

Q. Choose the correct option for the assertion and reason mentioned:

Assertion: Democratic government has to be answerable to the people of the country for any steps taken by the government.

Reason: It is not a fundamental property of a democratic government.

Join BYJU'S Learning Program

Which of these is not a valid reason for arguing that there is a lesser possibility of famine in a democratic country?

The correct option is D People are free to believe in and practise any religion.Option d is not a valid reason for arguing that there is a lesser possibility of famine in a democratic country. This is because practising a religion has nothing to do with preventing famine.

The correct option is D People are free to believe in and practise any religion.
Option d is not a valid reason for arguing that there is a lesser possibility of famine in a democratic country. This is because practising a religion has nothing to do with preventing famine.